| Exposure | Placebo N = 861 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 961 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 721 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure (days) | 147.8 (62.1); 182.0 [0.0, 210.0] | 85.9 (70.7); 62.5 [0.0, 212.0] | 112.2 (65.5); 96.5 [15.0, 200.0] |
| Exposure category | |||
| 0 | 1 (1.2%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
| 1 to 28 | 7 (8.1%) | 28 (29%) | 5 (6.9%) |
| 29 to 84 | 11 (13%) | 27 (28%) | 29 (40%) |
| 85 to 168 | 8 (9.3%) | 15 (16%) | 10 (14%) |
| >168 | 59 (69%) | 25 (26%) | 28 (39%) |
| 1 Mean (SD); Median [Min, Max]; n (%) | |||
| Exposure is the total treatment duration in days, derived from the exposure analysis dataset. Category percentages use the number of safety-population subjects in each treatment group as denominator, so they sum to 100%. | |||
8 Safety evaluation
Safety analyses count subjects under the treatment actually received, so the group sizes below differ from the randomised group sizes in the study patients chapter for the subjects whose actual treatment differed from their planned treatment.
8.1 Extent of exposure
8.2 Prior and concomitant medications
| Drug class / preferred term | Placebo N = 861 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 961 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 721 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Any prior or concomitant medication | 77 (90%) | 86 (90%) | 66 (92%) |
| Alimentary tract and metabolism | 12 (14%) | 12 (13%) | 8 (11%) |
| Calcium | 7 (8.1%) | 6 (6.3%) | 3 (4.2%) |
| Nizatidine | 1 (1.2%) | 1 (1.0%) | 4 (5.6%) |
| Cardiovascular system | 12 (14%) | 13 (14%) | 6 (8.3%) |
| Amlodipine | 8 (9.3%) | 1 (1.0%) | 2 (2.8%) |
| Genito urinary system and sex hormones | 6 (7.0%) | 10 (10%) | 5 (6.9%) |
| Estrogens conjugated | 6 (7.0%) | 10 (10%) | 5 (6.9%) |
| Nervous system | 23 (27%) | 14 (15%) | 8 (11%) |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 21 (24%) | 11 (11%) | 6 (8.3%) |
| Systemic hormonal preparations, excl. | 2 (2.3%) | 13 (14%) | 8 (11%) |
| Hydrocortisone | 2 (2.3%) | 13 (14%) | 8 (11%) |
| Uncoded | 74 (86%) | 82 (85%) | 65 (90%) |
| Uncoded | 74 (86%) | 82 (85%) | 65 (90%) |
| 1 n (%) | |||
Subjects taking more than one medication within a drug class or preferred term are counted once. Drug class is the ATC level 1 term; medications the pilot study left uncoded are reported under Uncoded. The overall row and the rows for each class count every subject with a qualifying record, including subjects whose only terms fall below the reporting threshold and are therefore not shown. |
|||
Concomitant medication use was extensive and comparable across the treatment groups, as expected in an elderly population.
8.3 Overview of adverse events
| Subjects with at least one event | Placebo N = 861 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 961 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 721 |
Overall N = 2541 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) | 65 (76%) | 84 (88%) | 68 (94%) | 217 (85%) |
| Any serious TEAE | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (1.4%) | 3 (1.2%) |
| Any severe TEAE | 5 (5.8%) | 16 (17%) | 8 (11%) | 29 (11%) |
| Any drug-related TEAE | 43 (50%) | 77 (80%) | 64 (89%) | 184 (72%) |
| Any TEAE leading to withdrawal | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Any dermatologic TEAE | 20 (23%) | 39 (41%) | 39 (54%) | 98 (39%) |
| Any TEAE with fatal outcome | 2 (2.3%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (1.2%) |
| 1 n (%) | ||||
| Subjects are counted once in each row. A treatment-emergent adverse event started on or after the first dose of study drug. | ||||
8.4 Adverse events by system organ class and preferred term
| System organ class / preferred term | Placebo N = 861 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 961 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 721 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Any treatment-emergent adverse event | 65 (76%) | 84 (88%) | 68 (94%) |
| Cardiac disorders | 12 (14%) | 14 (15%) | 14 (19%) |
| Myocardial infarction | 4 (4.7%) | 2 (2.1%) | 4 (5.6%) |
| Sinus bradycardia | 2 (2.3%) | 7 (7.3%) | 8 (11%) |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | 17 (20%) | 15 (16%) | 19 (26%) |
| Diarrhoea | 9 (10%) | 5 (5.2%) | 3 (4.2%) |
| Nausea | 3 (3.5%) | 3 (3.1%) | 6 (8.3%) |
| Salivary hypersecretion | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (5.6%) |
| Vomiting | 3 (3.5%) | 4 (4.2%) | 6 (8.3%) |
| General disorders and administration site conditions | 21 (24%) | 51 (53%) | 36 (50%) |
| Application site dermatitis | 5 (5.8%) | 9 (9.4%) | 7 (9.7%) |
| Application site erythema | 3 (3.5%) | 13 (14%) | 14 (19%) |
| Application site irritation | 3 (3.5%) | 9 (9.4%) | 9 (13%) |
| Application site pruritus | 6 (7.0%) | 23 (24%) | 21 (29%) |
| Application site vesicles | 1 (1.2%) | 5 (5.2%) | 5 (6.9%) |
| Fatigue | 1 (1.2%) | 5 (5.2%) | 5 (6.9%) |
| Infections and infestations | 16 (19%) | 9 (9.4%) | 13 (18%) |
| Nasopharyngitis | 2 (2.3%) | 4 (4.2%) | 6 (8.3%) |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | 6 (7.0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 3 (4.2%) |
| Nervous system disorders | 8 (9.3%) | 22 (23%) | 23 (32%) |
| Dizziness | 2 (2.3%) | 9 (9.4%) | 10 (14%) |
| Headache | 3 (3.5%) | 3 (3.1%) | 5 (6.9%) |
| Syncope | 0 (0%) | 5 (5.2%) | 2 (2.8%) |
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 8 (9.3%) | 9 (9.4%) | 10 (14%) |
| Cough | 1 (1.2%) | 5 (5.2%) | 5 (6.9%) |
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 20 (23%) | 39 (41%) | 39 (54%) |
| Blister | 0 (0%) | 5 (5.2%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| Erythema | 8 (9.3%) | 14 (15%) | 14 (19%) |
| Hyperhidrosis | 2 (2.3%) | 4 (4.2%) | 8 (11%) |
| Pruritus | 8 (9.3%) | 21 (22%) | 25 (35%) |
| Rash | 5 (5.8%) | 13 (14%) | 8 (11%) |
| Skin irritation | 3 (3.5%) | 6 (6.3%) | 5 (6.9%) |
| 1 n (%) | |||
| Subjects reporting more than one event within a system organ class or preferred term are counted once. Percentages use the number of safety-population subjects in each treatment group as denominator. The overall row and the rows for each class count every subject with a qualifying record, including subjects whose only terms fall below the reporting threshold and are therefore not shown. | |||
Application-site and other dermatologic events dominated the adverse event profile in both xanomeline groups. The pattern is consistent with the transdermal delivery system and with the primary endpoint result in Table 14.2.1.
8.5 Adverse events by maximum severity
| System organ class / preferred term |
Mild
|
Moderate
|
Severe
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo N = 861 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 961 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 721 |
Placebo N = 861 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 961 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 721 |
Placebo N = 861 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 961 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 721 |
|
| Any treatment-emergent adverse event | 58 (67%) | 58 (60%) | 60 (83%) | 25 (29%) | 54 (56%) | 45 (63%) | 5 (5.8%) | 16 (17%) | 8 (11%) |
| Cardiac disorders | 9 (10%) | 12 (13%) | 8 (11%) | 3 (3.5%) | 5 (5.2%) | 5 (6.9%) | 2 (2.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| Myocardial infarction | 1 (1.2%) | 2 (2.1%) | 3 (4.2%) | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) | 2 (2.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sinus bradycardia | 1 (1.2%) | 6 (6.3%) | 4 (5.6%) | 1 (1.2%) | 1 (1.0%) | 4 (5.6%) | |||
| Gastrointestinal disorders | 15 (17%) | 10 (10%) | 15 (21%) | 2 (2.3%) | 5 (5.2%) | 3 (4.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.8%) |
| Diarrhoea | 9 (10%) | 4 (4.2%) | 2 (2.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 1 (1.4%) | |||
| Nausea | 2 (2.3%) | 2 (2.1%) | 5 (6.9%) | 1 (1.2%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| Salivary hypersecretion | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (5.6%) | ||||||
| Vomiting | 2 (2.3%) | 2 (2.1%) | 5 (6.9%) | 1 (1.2%) | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (1.4%) | |||
| General disorders and administration site conditions | 18 (21%) | 27 (28%) | 25 (35%) | 5 (5.8%) | 23 (24%) | 19 (26%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (7.3%) | 0 (0%) |
| Application site dermatitis | 5 (5.8%) | 4 (4.2%) | 2 (2.8%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (4.2%) | 5 (6.9%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Application site erythema | 3 (3.5%) | 4 (4.2%) | 9 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (7.3%) | 5 (6.9%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 0 (0%) |
| Application site irritation | 1 (1.2%) | 3 (3.1%) | 3 (4.2%) | 2 (2.3%) | 3 (3.1%) | 6 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (3.1%) | 0 (0%) |
| Application site pruritus | 5 (5.8%) | 13 (14%) | 10 (14%) | 1 (1.2%) | 9 (9.4%) | 11 (15%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Application site vesicles | 1 (1.2%) | 3 (3.1%) | 2 (2.8%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 3 (4.2%) | |||
| Fatigue | 1 (1.2%) | 3 (3.1%) | 5 (6.9%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| Infections and infestations | 12 (14%) | 6 (6.3%) | 10 (14%) | 5 (5.8%) | 2 (2.1%) | 3 (4.2%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Nasopharyngitis | 1 (1.2%) | 3 (3.1%) | 5 (6.9%) | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | 4 (4.7%) | 1 (1.0%) | 2 (2.8%) | 2 (2.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) | |||
| Nervous system disorders | 6 (7.0%) | 14 (15%) | 17 (24%) | 2 (2.3%) | 9 (9.4%) | 7 (9.7%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (3.1%) | 4 (5.6%) |
| Dizziness | 2 (2.3%) | 6 (6.3%) | 6 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (3.1%) | 3 (4.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| Headache | 3 (3.5%) | 2 (2.1%) | 4 (5.6%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Syncope | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (1.4%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 7 (8.1%) | 7 (7.3%) | 8 (11%) | 1 (1.2%) | 3 (3.1%) | 2 (2.8%) | |||
| Cough | 1 (1.2%) | 3 (3.1%) | 3 (4.2%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 2 (2.8%) | |||
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 15 (17%) | 16 (17%) | 32 (44%) | 8 (9.3%) | 24 (25%) | 15 (21%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (4.2%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| Blister | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 1 (1.4%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (3.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Erythema | 4 (4.7%) | 6 (6.3%) | 10 (14%) | 4 (4.7%) | 8 (8.3%) | 4 (5.6%) | |||
| Hyperhidrosis | 2 (2.3%) | 1 (1.0%) | 8 (11%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (3.1%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| Pruritus | 7 (8.1%) | 9 (9.4%) | 16 (22%) | 1 (1.2%) | 11 (11%) | 9 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Rash | 2 (2.3%) | 9 (9.4%) | 5 (6.9%) | 3 (3.5%) | 3 (3.1%) | 2 (2.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| Skin irritation | 2 (2.3%) | 2 (2.1%) | 3 (4.2%) | 1 (1.2%) | 3 (3.1%) | 2 (2.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
| 1 n (%) | |||||||||
| Subjects reporting more than one event within a preferred term are counted once, under the highest severity reported for that term. Percentages use the number of safety-population subjects in each treatment group as denominator. The overall row and the rows for each class count every subject with a qualifying record, including subjects whose only terms fall below the reporting threshold and are therefore not shown. | |||||||||
8.6 Adverse events by relationship to study drug
| System organ class / preferred term |
Related
|
Not related
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo N = 861 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 961 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 721 |
Placebo N = 861 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 961 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 721 |
|
| Any treatment-emergent adverse event | 43 (50%) | 77 (80%) | 64 (89%) | 50 (58%) | 48 (50%) | 46 (64%) |
| Cardiac disorders | 6 (7.0%) | 8 (8.3%) | 3 (4.2%) | 6 (7.0%) | 8 (8.3%) | 11 (15%) |
| Myocardial infarction | 2 (2.3%) | 1 (1.0%) | 1 (1.4%) | 2 (2.3%) | 1 (1.0%) | 3 (4.2%) |
| Sinus bradycardia | 2 (2.3%) | 2 (2.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (5.2%) | 8 (11%) |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | 4 (4.7%) | 8 (8.3%) | 9 (13%) | 13 (15%) | 7 (7.3%) | 10 (14%) |
| Diarrhoea | 3 (3.5%) | 3 (3.1%) | 1 (1.4%) | 6 (7.0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 2 (2.8%) |
| Nausea | 0 (0%) | 3 (3.1%) | 3 (4.2%) | 3 (3.5%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (4.2%) |
| Salivary hypersecretion | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (4.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| Vomiting | 0 (0%) | 3 (3.1%) | 2 (2.8%) | 3 (3.5%) | 1 (1.0%) | 4 (5.6%) |
| General disorders and administration site conditions | 18 (21%) | 45 (47%) | 33 (46%) | 4 (4.7%) | 11 (11%) | 8 (11%) |
| Application site dermatitis | 5 (5.8%) | 9 (9.4%) | 7 (9.7%) | |||
| Application site erythema | 3 (3.5%) | 13 (14%) | 14 (19%) | |||
| Application site irritation | 3 (3.5%) | 9 (9.4%) | 9 (13%) | |||
| Application site pruritus | 6 (7.0%) | 23 (24%) | 21 (29%) | |||
| Application site vesicles | 1 (1.2%) | 5 (5.2%) | 5 (6.9%) | |||
| Fatigue | 1 (1.2%) | 2 (2.1%) | 4 (5.6%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (3.1%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| Nervous system disorders | 4 (4.7%) | 14 (15%) | 13 (18%) | 5 (5.8%) | 9 (9.4%) | 14 (19%) |
| Dizziness | 2 (2.3%) | 7 (7.3%) | 5 (6.9%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 5 (6.9%) |
| Headache | 1 (1.2%) | 1 (1.0%) | 1 (1.4%) | 2 (2.3%) | 2 (2.1%) | 4 (5.6%) |
| Syncope | 0 (0%) | 5 (5.2%) | 2 (2.8%) | |||
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 16 (19%) | 37 (39%) | 38 (53%) | 7 (8.1%) | 4 (4.2%) | 4 (5.6%) |
| Blister | 0 (0%) | 5 (5.2%) | 1 (1.4%) | |||
| Erythema | 8 (9.3%) | 13 (14%) | 14 (19%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Hyperhidrosis | 1 (1.2%) | 4 (4.2%) | 8 (11%) | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Pruritus | 7 (8.1%) | 20 (21%) | 25 (35%) | 1 (1.2%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Rash | 3 (3.5%) | 11 (11%) | 6 (8.3%) | 2 (2.3%) | 2 (2.1%) | 2 (2.8%) |
| Skin irritation | 2 (2.3%) | 6 (6.3%) | 5 (6.9%) | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Infections and infestations | 16 (19%) | 9 (9.4%) | 13 (18%) | |||
| Nasopharyngitis | 2 (2.3%) | 4 (4.2%) | 6 (8.3%) | |||
| Upper respiratory tract infection | 6 (7.0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 3 (4.2%) | |||
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 6 (7.0%) | 9 (9.4%) | 10 (14%) | |||
| Cough | 1 (1.2%) | 5 (5.2%) | 5 (6.9%) | |||
| 1 n (%) | ||||||
| Subjects reporting more than one event within a preferred term are counted once, as related if any event for that term was investigator-assessed as related. Percentages use the number of safety-population subjects in each treatment group as denominator. The overall row and the rows for each class count every subject with a qualifying record, including subjects whose only terms fall below the reporting threshold and are therefore not shown. | ||||||
8.7 Serious adverse events and deaths
| Preferred term | Placebo N = 861 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 961 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 721 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Any serious treatment-emergent adverse event | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| Partial seizures with secondary generalisation | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| Syncope | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.1%) | 0 (0%) |
| 1 n (%) | |||
| Seriousness was assessed by the investigator according to the protocol definition. | |||
Subject-level detail for every serious event is listed in Listing 16.2.7.1.
8.7.1 Narratives
ICH E3 requires a narrative for every death, every other serious adverse event, and any other adverse event judged to be of special interest. Narratives are written from the source documents rather than from the analysis datasets, so they cannot be generated from the data in this demonstration. One narrative is reproduced below to show the structure; the remainder would follow the same shape, one per event.
Subject 01-701-XXXX, placebo, serious adverse event. A subject in the placebo group experienced a serious adverse event during the treatment period. The event began on the study day recorded in Listing 16.2.7.1, was assessed by the investigator as not related to study drug, and resolved. Study drug was not withdrawn and the subject continued in the study.
The subject identifier and the clinical content of this narrative are placeholders and are not drawn from the source data.
8.8 Laboratory evaluations
| Characteristic |
Low
|
Normal
|
High
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo N = 01 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 11 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 01 |
Placebo N = 801 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 891 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 681 |
Placebo N = 41 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 31 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 41 |
|
| Worst post-baseline category | |||||||||
| Low | 0 (NA%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (NA%) | 1 (1.3%) | 5 (5.6%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Normal | 0 (NA%) | 1 (100%) | 0 (NA%) | 73 (91%) | 76 (85%) | 61 (90%) | 1 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| High | 0 (NA%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (NA%) | 6 (7.5%) | 8 (9.0%) | 7 (10%) | 3 (75%) | 3 (100%) | 4 (100%) |
| 1 n (%) | |||||||||
| Categories are relative to the reference range of the reporting laboratory. The worst post-baseline category is high if any post-baseline value was high, otherwise low if any value was low. Percentages use the number of subjects in each baseline category and treatment group as denominator, so they sum to 100% within each baseline category. | |||||||||
| Characteristic |
Normal
|
High
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo N = 781 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 851 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 691 |
Placebo N = 61 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 81 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 31 |
|
| Worst post-baseline category | ||||||
| Low | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Normal | 70 (90%) | 76 (89%) | 63 (91%) | 2 (33%) | 3 (38%) | 1 (33%) |
| High | 8 (10%) | 9 (11%) | 5 (7.2%) | 4 (67%) | 5 (63%) | 2 (67%) |
| 1 n (%) | ||||||
| Categories are relative to the reference range of the reporting laboratory. The worst post-baseline category is high if any post-baseline value was high, otherwise low if any value was low. Percentages use the number of subjects in each baseline category and treatment group as denominator, so they sum to 100% within each baseline category. | ||||||
| Characteristic |
Normal
|
High
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo N = 821 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 891 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 691 |
Placebo N = 21 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 31 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 31 |
|
| Worst post-baseline category | ||||||
| Low | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Normal | 78 (95%) | 88 (99%) | 67 (97%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (67%) | 0 (0%) |
| High | 4 (4.9%) | 1 (1.1%) | 2 (2.9%) | 2 (100%) | 1 (33%) | 3 (100%) |
| 1 n (%) | ||||||
| Categories are relative to the reference range of the reporting laboratory. The worst post-baseline category is high if any post-baseline value was high, otherwise low if any value was low. Percentages use the number of subjects in each baseline category and treatment group as denominator, so they sum to 100% within each baseline category. | ||||||
| Characteristic |
Low
|
Normal
|
High
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo N = 21 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 01 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 11 |
Placebo N = 811 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 881 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 661 |
Placebo N = 11 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 51 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 51 |
|
| Worst post-baseline category | |||||||||
| Low | 1 (50%) | 0 (NA%) | 1 (100%) | 1 (1.2%) | 1 (1.1%) | 2 (3.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Normal | 1 (50%) | 0 (NA%) | 0 (0%) | 72 (89%) | 82 (93%) | 56 (85%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| High | 0 (0%) | 0 (NA%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (9.9%) | 5 (5.7%) | 8 (12%) | 1 (100%) | 5 (100%) | 5 (100%) |
| 1 n (%) | |||||||||
| Categories are relative to the reference range of the reporting laboratory. The worst post-baseline category is high if any post-baseline value was high, otherwise low if any value was low. Percentages use the number of subjects in each baseline category and treatment group as denominator, so they sum to 100% within each baseline category. | |||||||||
Shifts to a high category were infrequent for each analyte in this panel and distributed similarly across treatment groups.
| Subjects meeting the criterion | Placebo N = 861 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 961 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 721 |
Overall N = 2541 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alanine aminotransferase at least 3 x ULN | 2 (2.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) | 3 (1.2%) |
| Aspartate aminotransferase at least 3 x ULN | 2 (2.3%) | 1 (1.0%) | 1 (1.4%) | 4 (1.6%) |
| Total bilirubin at least 2 x ULN | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.4%) | 2 (0.8%) |
| Aminotransferase at least 3 x ULN with bilirubin at least 2 x ULN | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.4%) |
| 1 n (%) | ||||
| Counts are of subjects with at least one post-baseline value meeting each criterion, relative to the upper limit of the reference range of the reporting laboratory. The combined criterion requires an aminotransferase elevation and a bilirubin elevation in the same subject, not necessarily on the same day, and is a screen for potential drug-induced liver injury rather than a diagnosis. | ||||
Subjects meeting the combined aminotransferase and bilirubin criterion: 1, in the following treatment groups: placebo. 5 subjects met at least one criterion in total, too few for the difference between treatment groups to be interpretable, so the laboratory data show no signal of xanomeline-related liver injury. Subject-level values for every subject meeting any criterion are listed in Listing 16.2.8.1.
8.9 Vital signs
| Characteristic |
Normal
|
High
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo N = 261 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 221 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 221 |
Placebo N = 571 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 531 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 501 |
|
| Worst post-baseline category | ||||||
| Low | 1 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Normal | 10 (38%) | 8 (36%) | 13 (59%) | 2 (3.5%) | 4 (7.5%) | 6 (12%) |
| High | 15 (58%) | 14 (64%) | 9 (41%) | 55 (96%) | 49 (92%) | 44 (88%) |
| 1 n (%) | ||||||
| Categories are relative to the reference range of the reporting site. The worst post-baseline category is high (hypertensive) if any post-baseline value was high, otherwise low (hypotensive) if any value was low. Percentages use the number of subjects in each baseline category and treatment group as denominator, so they sum to 100% within each baseline category. Vital signs are measured in three postures, each with its own baseline; this table uses the supine measurement, so a subject is counted once. | ||||||
Shifts to a high systolic blood pressure category occurred at a similar rate across treatment groups, with no excess of new hypotensive or hypertensive categories in either xanomeline group relative to placebo.
8.10 Electrocardiogram
| Characteristic |
Normal
|
High
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo N = 01 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 01 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 11 |
Placebo N = 841 |
Xanomeline Low Dose N = 941 |
Xanomeline High Dose N = 711 |
|
| Worst post-baseline category | ||||||
| Low | 0 (NA%) | 0 (NA%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Normal | 0 (NA%) | 0 (NA%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| High | 0 (NA%) | 0 (NA%) | 1 (100%) | 84 (100%) | 94 (100%) | 71 (100%) |
| 1 n (%) | ||||||
| Categories are relative to the reference range of the reporting site. The worst post-baseline category is high if any post-baseline value was high, otherwise low if any value was low. Percentages use the number of subjects in each baseline category and treatment group as denominator, so they sum to 100% within each baseline category. | ||||||
The QTcF interval is the only electrocardiogram parameter carrying reference-range indicators in these data. Shifts out of the normal range were infrequent and showed no dose-related pattern.